sedor's result (2017/05/10 21:57:34)
Result ID:
Post date:
2017-05-10 21:57
LuxMark version:
3.1
OS:
Windows
Benchmark mode:
OpenCL
Benchmark sub-mode:
GPU
Scene:
Hotel
Score:
58,376
Note:
OpenCL device count:
9
| Platform name | Platform version | Symbolic device name | Device name | Device type | Units | Clock | Vector width | Max. global mem. | Local mem. | Constant mem. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | TITAN X (Pascal) [28 units @ 1531MHz] | TITAN X (Pascal) | GPU | 28 | 1,531 MHz | 1 | 12,582,912 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti [28 units @ 1582MHz] | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GPU | 28 | 1,582 MHz | 1 | 11,534,336 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti [22 units @ 1190MHz] | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GPU | 22 | 1,190 MHz | 1 | 6,291,456 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | GeForce GTX TITAN X [24 units @ 1076MHz] | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GPU | 24 | 1,076 MHz | 1 | 12,582,912 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | GeForce GTX TITAN X [24 units @ 1076MHz] | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GPU | 24 | 1,076 MHz | 1 | 12,582,912 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti [28 units @ 1582MHz] | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GPU | 28 | 1,582 MHz | 1 | 11,534,336 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti [22 units @ 1190MHz] | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GPU | 22 | 1,190 MHz | 1 | 6,291,456 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | GeForce GTX 1080 [20 units @ 1733MHz] | GeForce GTX 1080 | GPU | 20 | 1,733 MHz | 1 | 8,388,608 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
| NVIDIA Corporation | OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 | TITAN X (Pascal) [28 units @ 1531MHz] | TITAN X (Pascal) | GPU | 28 | 1,531 MHz | 1 | 12,582,912 Kbytes | 48 Kbytes | 64 Kbytes |
Does it look like a legit result ?:
No votes yet
Is it an interesting result ?:
No votes yet